Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 10:06:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308704: cweb: Dummy package still needed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 23:32:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 16:32:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DW0h7-0007si-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:32:49 -0700
Received: (qmail 8563 invoked by uid 1013); 11 May 2005 23:32:47 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:32:47 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cweb: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cweb
Version: 3.64.debian-2
The 'cweb' package is present in sarge/sid and is also present (with the
exact same version) in woody. However, this is a dummy transition-only
package (for potato?). Are there any reasons for this package to still
exist in the distribution? If not, please ask for its removal.
Regards
Javier
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308704-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 09:06:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 02:06:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail3.uklinux.net [80.84.72.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DW9ek-0004by-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:06:58 -0700
Received: from ip6-localhost (adsl-static-1-123.uklinux.net [62.245.36.123])
by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F392409FE9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 09:06:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jdg by ip6-localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DW9ei-0003nA-TX
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:06:56 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:06:56 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308704: cweb: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:32:47AM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> Package: cweb
> Version: 3.64.debian-2
>
> The 'cweb' package is present in sarge/sid and is also present (with the
> exact same version) in woody. However, this is a dummy transition-only
> package (for potato?). Are there any reasons for this package to still
> exist in the distribution? If not, please ask for its removal.
Sorry, I should have closed this bug.
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
