Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 21:14:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line was fixed I believe
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2003 22:09:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 23 17:09:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19qgZi-0005Rc-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:09:34 -0500
Received: from arf ([67.75.27.15]) by mx04.gis.net; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:09:33
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19qgeM-0003V3-00; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:14:22 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elinks: confusing 'yes/no' prompt colors
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.24
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:14:22 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: elinks
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: minor
Some of 'elinks' prompt colors are confusing; for example, if 'q'
is pressed, the user sees:
Do you really want to exit ELinks?
[ Yes ] [ No ]
...where "Do you..." is black on gray, "Yes" is bright yellow on green,
and "No" is bright white on blue. The green, blue, bright white and
bright yellow stand out.
The only visual cue to tell which of the two buttons is active
when 'Enter' is hit, is the cursor under the 'Y'. Relative to
the bright white and yellow, it's a bit subtle.
The first few times using this prompt I had to think about it.
Sometimes I was too quick and got it wrong.
Suggestion: 'mc' or the 'midnight commander' does it well. Example:
Do you really want to quit the Midnight Commander?
[ Yes ] [ No ]
...where "Do you..." is black on gray, "Yes" is black on aqua, with
a bright yellow 'Y' over the cursor, and "No" is black on gray, with
the 'N' dark blue on gray. The 'mc' prompt colors make the button
status intuitively obvious.
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages elinks depends on:
ii debconf 1.3.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file
ii libc6 2.3.2-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.6-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libgnutls5 0.8.8-2 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-12.1 General Purpose Mouse Library [lib
ii liblua40 4.0-11 Main interpreter library for the L
ii liblualib40 4.0-11 Extension library for the Lua prog
ii xlibs 4.2.1-10 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 19:15:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 12:15:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lifeforce.hu (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWJ9Z-000580-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:15:26 -0700
Received: from localhost.lifeforce.hu ([127.0.0.1] helo=narya)
by narya.grin.hu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DWJ9B-0006xB-QX; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:15:21 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:14:59 +0200
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: was fixed I believe
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Disorganized
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----)
X-Scan-Signature: 0acd0580846ecc5ab44799d635b0cb7c
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
these were fixed as far as I see (either it's fixed, I cannot reproduce or they
seem to be
left alone by the submitter).
if it's still valid please reopen and tell me about it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
