Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 21:14:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line was fixed I believe
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2003 15:42:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 23 09:42:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (txsmtp01.texas.rr.com) [24.93.36.229]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bjVJ-0005X2-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:42:57 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain (cs2417534-45.austin.rr.com [24.175.34.45])
by txsmtp01.texas.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h0NFcEua022760
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:38:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Package: links numbering scheme is arbitrary and harmful
From: Hunter Peress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
Date: 23 Jan 2003 09:56:18 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: links
For example: the upstream package, "Elinks" has a current version number
of: 0.4.2rc2 the links package in its changelog.gz even recognizes
these numbers. The Debian version of the package currently is
:0.96.20020409-2
Change: this number scheme to better reflect the upstream version.
Why? I sent an email to the Elinks mailing list, and to communicate what
version I was using, I obviously could not tell the debian version
number (1 reason). So instead I had to :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~]%links -version
ELinks 0.4pre5 - Text WWW browser
(2nd reason).
And we see immediately the normal upstream numbering scheme here, and
hence just how shallow the debian numbering scheme is (3rd reason).
THEN, someone on the mailing list replied to my issue and said "yes its
fixed in v. 0.4.2rc1". So how with the debian numbering scheme am I to
be able to verify if a version with the change Im looking for is
anywhere in debian (4th reason). Well... I could add to my sources.list
some unstable servers (5th reason). And apt-get update (6th), and
apt-get source for the unstable version (7th), and look at the docs
(8th), and MAYBE I will find the correct information (9th)....
I think my point is clear.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 178055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 19:15:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 12:15:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lifeforce.hu (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWJ9Z-000580-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 12:15:26 -0700
Received: from localhost.lifeforce.hu ([127.0.0.1] helo=narya)
by narya.grin.hu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DWJ9B-0006xB-QX; Thu, 12 May 2005 21:15:21 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:14:59 +0200
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: was fixed I believe
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Disorganized
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----)
X-Scan-Signature: 0acd0580846ecc5ab44799d635b0cb7c
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
these were fixed as far as I see (either it's fixed, I cannot reproduce or they
seem to be
left alone by the submitter).
if it's still valid please reopen and tell me about it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
