Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2005 13:08:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308978: Azureus unstable won't launch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 15:34:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 08:34:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from space2.vosn.net [205.214.67.152]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWcBX-000541-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 08:34:43 -0700
Received: from 63-230-68-188.clsp.qwest.net ([63.230.68.188]
helo=[192.168.2.10])
by space2.vosn.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.44)
id 1DWcAI-0004Vo-4c
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 May 2005 16:33:04 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:33:26 -0600
From: "Lance W. Haverkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Azureus unstable won't launch
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-yourhost-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-yourhost-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yourhost-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - space2.vosn.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - thehaverkamps.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: azureus
Version: (2.3.0.0-2) [contrib]
The unstable version does not seem to start at all. I have Sun's Java
1.5.0_03 installed. I used to have an earlier version of azureus
installed, which I have uninstalled since it wasn't upgradidng properly.
I removed the unstable & installed testing (2.2.0.2-1) which works just
fine--as long as I don't let it internally upgrade.
I am using SimplyMEPIS 3.3, Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.x, kernel.
--
Thanks!
Lance W. Haverkamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
719.495.9084
13520 New Discovery Rd.
Colorado Springs, CO 80908
------------
v-card http://TheHaverkamps.net/Lance_Haverkamp.vcf
pgp key http://TheHaverkamps.net/Lance_Haverkamp.asc
x.509 http://TheHaverkamps.net/Lance_Haverkamp.cer
------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity
http://SpringsChurch.net
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restorationism
http://ApprovalVoting.org
http://SilverMoney.net
http://Mepis.org
http://ConstitutionParty.com
http://www.Scouting.org
http://nra.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308978-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 20:09:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 13:09:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX2wW-0000Lo-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:09:00 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so350350rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=J9h6qhzoomD8G54qk969oUdaYC1+nwPgeCwi94faWLtseOfS08nAa5Vz/YUenM5zYaauQoaddvAc8M4rclPmU8avLGqSpmrz3GBFeCbP87+iU9TnuJuwcbCP3IR6MgqfTJX8wzwi/VTqkg3/f/FIY0Cf9OikiMTTl7Iq9P6dAyY=
Received: by 10.11.116.53 with SMTP id o53mr58293cwc;
Sat, 14 May 2005 13:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.11.99.15 with HTTP; Sat, 14 May 2005 13:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:08:59 -0700
From: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lance W. Haverkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308978: Azureus unstable won't launch
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On 5/14/05, Lance W. Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > On 5/14/05, Lance W. Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I went in & manually changed the /etc/alternatives link from 1.4.2 to
> >>1.5.0_xx; which allowed the unstable version of azureus to find java.
> >
> > Does Azureus work now?
>=20
> Yes Azureus works now. Once you told me: "This [make-jpkg] will install
> the sun-j2re1.5 package. It provides the magic behind the
> /etc/alternatives/java link that I'm guessing you're missing." I looked
> at that directory & saw that the java links were there, but were
> pointing to the, now deleted, 1.4.2 installation. The 1.5.0 install was
> not writing over the old 1.4.2 links. I deleted the old 1.4.2 links &
> installed the deb again, but the links were *still* not being written.
> That's when...
>=20
> >>I went back & looked line-by-line at the make-jpkg process, and found
> >>errors (repeated many, many times) that are *not* being reported at the
> >>completion of the process:
>=20
> All those:
>=20
> /usr/share/mime-info/java-archive.keys: Permission denied
> /home/lance/Desktop/java/jre-1_5_0_03-linux-i586.bin: line 436:
> and
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libdl.so.2
> and
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency information for
> shared library libdl (soname 2, path , dependency field Depends)
>=20
> which took place during the make-jpkg process--are they the reason that
> the links aren't being created during the install part of the process?
I don't think so. These commands would give you more information on
the Java alternatives configuration though:
$ /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --list java
$ /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display java
# /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --auto java
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
