Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:56:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#465212: lampython: please rebuild with new LAM
libraries
has caused the Debian Bug report #465212,
regarding lampython: please rebuild with new LAM libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
465212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin//465212
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lampython
Version: 2.4.11-1
Severity: normal
liblam4-7.1.2-1.2 conflicts with lam4c2, which makes lampython uninstallable.
Thanks for your time and involvment in Debian.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages lampython depends on:
ii lam-runtime 7.1.2-1 LAM runtime environment for execut
ii lam4c2 7.1.2-1 Shared libraries used by LAM paral
ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii python-mpi 2.4.11-1 MPI module for Python
ii python2.4 2.4.4-7 An interactive high-level object-o
lampython recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:34:28PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:43:42AM +0100, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> > Package: lampython
> > Version: 2.4.11-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > liblam4-7.1.2-1.2 conflicts with lam4c2, which makes lampython
> > uninstallable.
> >
> > Thanks for your time and involvment in Debian.
>
> Dear Alexandre,
>
> Shouldn't a binNMU suffice for this? That was the original idea with
> Riku changing the package name for lam, but I am unsure.
Sorry for the disturbance, I forgot rule #2: "never fire reportbug
*before* the second cup of decent coffee" this morning.
Have a nice day !
--
Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services
Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
