Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2005 08:40:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295557: Please, Close the bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 17:40:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 09:40:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xuxa.gr.ssr.upm.es [138.4.37.12] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1T9w-000186-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:40:20 -0800
Received: from jambrina by xuxa.gr.ssr.upm.es with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1D1T9g-0004yX-Fx; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:40:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: "J.L. Fernandez Jambrina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba: a lot of Segfault in Samba
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:40:04 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GRSSRUPMES-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.10-1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have several "Segfault in Samba" lemail each day, some of them give
backtrace an others no (the executable could not be found for process #####).
I installed the samba-dbg package and I wait for the next
Segfault, and here is the backtrace. It's seems related with the laser
printer.
Thanks for your attention,
Jos�
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its
symbols.
0x40237fee in waitpid () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#0 0x40237fee in waitpid () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x401cdb62 in system () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x081e0541 in smb_panic2 (why=0x82b0b5d "internal error",
decrement_pid_count=1) at lib/util.c:1473
#3 0x081e04ca in smb_panic (why=0x82b0b5d "internal error") at
lib/util.c:1432
#4 0x081cc8e8 in fault_report (sig=11) at lib/fault.c:41
#5 <signal handler called>
#6 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#7 0x081f4587 in tdb_fetch (tdb=0x83bb560, key=
{dptr = 0xbffff900 "CACHE/laser", dsize = 12}) at tdb/tdb.c:1121
#8 0x081f6bb5 in tdb_fetch_int32_byblob (tdb=0x83bb560,
keyval=0xbffff900 "CACHE/laser", len=12) at tdb/tdbutil.c:154
#9 0x081f6c28 in tdb_fetch_int32 (tdb=0x83bb560,
keystr=0xbffff900 "CACHE/laser") at tdb/tdbutil.c:172
#10 0x081fe958 in print_cache_expired (snum=24) at printing/printing.c:1914
#11 0x081ffecf in print_queue_status (snum=24, ppqueue=0x0, status=0x0)
at printing/printing.c:2450
#12 0x0812dbf2 in update_monitored_printq_cache ()
at rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:1345
#13 0x080d400a in timeout_processing (deadtime=604800,
select_timeout=0xbffffbd4, last_timeout_processing_time=0xbffffbd8)
at smbd/process.c:1460
#14 0x080d448b in smbd_process () at smbd/process.c:1542
#15 0x082579ba in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffffde4) at smbd/server.c:910
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libacl1 2.2.23-1 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr2 1.35-6 The Common Error Description libra
ii libcupsys2-gnutls10 1.1.23-3 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility
ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii samba-common 3.0.10-1 Samba common files used by both th
-- debconf information:
samba/nmbd_from_inetd:
* samba/log_files_moved:
* samba/tdbsam: true
* samba/generate_smbpasswd: false
* samba/run_mode: inetd
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 12:41:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 05:41:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-066-057-089-009.nc.res.rr.com (canaima.chapus.net)
[66.57.89.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYkLD-0003rB-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:41:31 -0700
Received: from peloy by canaima.chapus.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYkKZ-00072d-Hz; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:40:51 -0400
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:40:51 -0400
To: =?iso-8859-1?B?Sm9zw6kgTC4gRmVybsOhbmRleg==?= Jambrina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#295557: Please, Close the bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: "Eloy A. Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Gracias Jose, we're closing the bug.
Cheers,
Eloy.-
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:18:52AM +0200, "Jos� L. Fern�ndez Jambrina" wrote:
> Dear sir,
> Twenty days after the upgrade to the 3.0.14a-1 we have no more
> segfaults. So please, close this 295557 bug.
>
> Yours,
>
> Jos�
>
> begin:vcard
> fn;quoted-printable:Jose L. Fern=C3=A1ndez Jambrina
> n;quoted-printable: Fern=C3=A1ndez Jambrina;Jose L.
> org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Unviersidad Polit=C3=A9cnica de
> Madrid;Se=C3=B1ales, Sistemas y Radiocomunicaciones
> adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;E.T.S.I.
> Telecomunicaci=C3=B3n;Madrid;Madrir;28040;Espa=C3=B1a - Spain
> email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> title:Profesor Titular de Universidad
> tel;work:91 549 57 00
> tel;fax:91 540 20 02
> note:Email alternativo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> x-mozilla-html:FALSE
> version:2.1
> end:vcard
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
