Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 20:51:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309786: cacti: cpu usage limited to 100%
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 15:09:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 08:09:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from opium.multi24.com [213.239.202.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYmeJ-0004Nm-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:09:24 -0700
Received: from galaxy.palfrader.org (argos.campus-sbg.at [62.99.152.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "galaxy.palfrader.org", Issuer "Peter Palfrader" (verified
OK))
by opium.multi24.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA96400191;
Thu, 19 May 2005 17:09:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by galaxy.palfrader.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AA56C400140; Thu, 19 May 2005 17:09:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cacti: cpu usage limited to 100%
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:09:21 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-7
Severity: minor
The Data Templates for
ucd/net - CPU Usage - Nice
ucd/net - CPU Usage - System
ucd/net - CPU Usage - User
have a 'Maximum Value' of 100, which is not sufficient for SMP machines
where it can get as high as 100 x <number of CPUs>
Please increase it to at least 400 (what I need :) or any other suitable
value.
--
Peter
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309786-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 00:52:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 17:52:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net)
[66.92.235.113]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZIEY-00021D-00; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:52:54 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5390715844; Fri, 20 May 2005 20:52:24 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:52:24 -0400
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:51:56 -0400
From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#309786: cacti: cpu usage limited to 100%
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi peter,
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:27:11AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I know that it's possible. I just figered that the default that comes
> with cacti should be fixed.
the trouble is, there's no default that will work equally well with
all of them (equally bad, maybe, by turning off the max and using
autoscale), plus "setting a default" is kind of tricky, as i believe
it's definied in the big sql dump you load in at install time.=20
really, i think the best option would be to copy the cpu usage graph
template and change one of the copies to be "4-way cpu usage" template.
so i'll go ahead and close this then.
thanks,
sean
--=20
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCjoYsynjLPm522B0RAjRZAJ4lA6TQwA3sFdlv9dH1N0YEYGg7AgCeLIYa
P/e+FPrmeKmf5EbC6m0V1Yk=
=kQ9n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
