Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 23:01:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RM: gtk-engines-mac2 -- RoQA: RC bugs; no upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 22:32:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 14 15:32:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from focus.syskonzept.net [85.131.168.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DX5BA-0001ft-00; Sat, 14 May 2005 15:32:16 -0700
Received: from phil by focus.syskonzept.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DX5B8-000475-3u
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 May 2005 22:32:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RM: gtk-engines-mac2 -- RoQA: RC bugs; no upstream
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 22:32:14 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The package ``gtk-engines-mac2'' should be removed from Debian unstable.
Reasoning:
* The package has a RC bug related to a porting issue. It is currently
not auto-buildable on mips(el), but an older version exists in
unstable.
* This is raised by the fact that the author failed to include
configure.in. Thus it is impossible to rebuild the autotools scripts.
* Mail to upstream bounces. The author address specified in AUTHORS is
unreachable. Some searches on Google did not reveal any other active
upstream maintainer.
* The package is orphaned since March 2005, when its developer was
considered MIA. (WNPP bug: #298151)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309154-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 21:01:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 14:01:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZb5r-00034d-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:01:12 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DZb6D-0002T2-Ud; Sat, 21 May 2005 23:01:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 23:01:33 +0200
To: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RM: gtk-engines-mac2 -- RoQA: RC bugs; no upstream
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:50:10AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:32:14PM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > The package ``gtk-engines-mac2'' should be removed from Debian unstable.
> (..)
> > * The package is orphaned since March 2005, when its developer was
> > considered MIA. (WNPP bug: #298151)
>
> Please:
> 1) Cc your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or similar if you're making requests
> in name of QA
> 2) Rather than filing a new bug, reassign and retitle the wnpp one.
Hrmz, I meant to close this bug, doing so now. See #298151.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]