Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2008 01:11:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#379908: lm-sensors: vid reading wrong regardless of
VRM version set
has caused the Debian Bug report #379908,
regarding lm-sensors: vid reading wrong regardless of VRM version set
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
379908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 1:2.10.0-7
Severity: normal
The motherboard is an Intel SE7230NH1-E (E7230 + ICH7R chipset), the
sensor chip's supposedly an lm85 and the CPU is a Pentium D 930. The
kernel is 2.6.17.4 with libata-tj-stable patches and .config copied
from the 2.6.17 in unstable.
Vcore should be 1.25V-1.4V according to the data sheet - it shows a
bit lower at 1.22V but that should be fine.
Problem is, the VID reading is way off. I tried vrm version 9.0, 9.1,
and 10.0 with the following results:
vid: +1.850 V (VRM Version 9.x)
vid: +1.087 V (VRM Version 10.0)
Rest of sensors output looks good:
V1.5: +1.51 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.58 V)
VCore: +1.23 V (min = +1.03 V, max = +1.14 V) ALARM
V3.3: +3.28 V (min = +3.13 V, max = +3.47 V)
V5: +5.03 V (min = +4.74 V, max = +5.26 V)
V12: +12.06 V (min = +11.38 V, max = +12.62 V)
CPU_Fan: 4603 RPM (min = 4000 RPM)
fan4: 1621 RPM (min = 700 RPM)
CPU: + (low = +, high = +)
Board: + (low = +, high = +) ALARM
Remote: + (low = +, high = +) ALARM
Could this have something to do with it?
i2c_adapter i2c-0: lm85: Detected SMSC chip
i2c_adapter i2c-0: lm85: Unrecognized version/stepping 0x68\
Defaulting to Generic LM85.
Thanks,
C.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.4-99-em64t-p4-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages lm-sensors depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libsensors3 1:2.10.0-7 library to read temperature/voltag
ii perl 5.8.8-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sed 4.1.5-1 The GNU sed stream editor
ii sysvinit 2.86.ds1-14.1 System-V-like init utilities
ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages lm-sensors recommends:
ii linux-image-2.6.17.4-99-em64t 2.6.17.4-1 Linux kernel binary image for vers
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:36:47AM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > Package: lm-sensors
> > Version: 1:2.10.0-7
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > The motherboard is an Intel SE7230NH1-E (E7230 + ICH7R chipset), the
> > sensor chip's supposedly an lm85 and the CPU is a Pentium D 930. The
> > kernel is 2.6.17.4 with libata-tj-stable patches and .config copied
> > from the 2.6.17 in unstable.
> >
> > Vcore should be 1.25V-1.4V according to the data sheet - it shows a
> > bit lower at 1.22V but that should be fine.
> >
> > Problem is, the VID reading is way off. I tried vrm version 9.0, 9.1,
> > and 10.0 with the following results:
> >
> > vid: +1.850 V (VRM Version 9.x)
> > vid: +1.087 V (VRM Version 10.0)
>
> Given your CPU is a Pentium D930, the VRM should be version 10.0.
>
> > Rest of sensors output looks good:
> >
> > V1.5: +1.51 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.58 V)
> > VCore: +1.23 V (min = +1.03 V, max = +1.14 V) ALARM
> > V3.3: +3.28 V (min = +3.13 V, max = +3.47 V)
> > V5: +5.03 V (min = +4.74 V, max = +5.26 V)
> > V12: +12.06 V (min = +11.38 V, max = +12.62 V)
> > CPU_Fan: 4603 RPM (min = 4000 RPM)
> > fan4: 1621 RPM (min = 700 RPM)
> > CPU: + (low = +, high = +)
> > Board: + (low = +, high = +) ALARM
> > Remote: + (low = +, high = +) ALARM
> >
> > Could this have something to do with it?
> >
> > i2c_adapter i2c-0: lm85: Detected SMSC chip
> > i2c_adapter i2c-0: lm85: Unrecognized version/stepping 0x68\
> > Defaulting to Generic LM85.
> >
>
> It looks like your chip is an unidentified chip of the serie lm96000.
> Basically it means that only the functions common to all lm85 chips are
> supported, which include reading the vid.
>
> In any case the bug is not in lm-sensors, which only reads data from
> /sys, but in the kernel. Could you please retry with a more recent
> kernel?
No answer from the submitter, closing the bug. Please feel free to
reopen it in case it can still be reproduced.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
