Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:00:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#417873: Incomplete patch
has caused the Debian Bug report #417873,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
417873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417873
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: havp
Version: 0.85-1
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Tags: patch

Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3.  Version 4.3 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning.  In GCC 4.3, the C++ header
dependencies have been cleaned up.  The advantage of this is that
programs will compile faster.  The downside is that you actually
need to directly #include everything you use (but you really should
do this anyway, otherwise your program won't work with any compiler
other than GCC).  Some background of this can be found at
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28080

You can reproduce this problem with gcc-snapshot (20070326-1 or higher)
from unstable. (Currently not available for i386, but for amd64, powerpc
and ia64.  I hope to have i386 binaries in the archive in ~3 weeks.)


> Automatic build of havp_0.85-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include -Wall -O2 -Wall 
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c -o helper.o helper.cpp
> helper.cpp: In function 'void ExitProcess(int)':
> helper.cpp:84: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp: In function 'bool MakeDaemon()':
> helper.cpp:151: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp: In function 'bool HardLockTest()':
> helper.cpp:173: error: 'mkstemp' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp:267: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp:277: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp:290: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> helper.cpp:294: error: 'exit' was not declared in this scope
> make[2]: *** [helper.o] Error 1

--- havp/helper.cpp~    2007-04-05 06:47:50.000000000 +0000
+++ havp/helper.cpp     2007-04-05 06:47:59.000000000 +0000
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <grp.h>
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <cstdlib>
 #include <iostream>
 #include <fstream>
 
--- havp/scannerhandler.cpp~    2007-04-05 06:48:07.000000000 +0000
+++ havp/scannerhandler.cpp     2007-04-05 06:48:17.000000000 +0000
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <cstdlib>
 
 extern char TempFileName[MAXSCANTEMPFILELENGTH+1];
 extern int fd_tempfile;
--- havp/params.cpp~    2007-04-05 06:48:44.000000000 +0000
+++ havp/params.cpp     2007-04-05 06:48:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <sys/socket.h>
 #include <netinet/in.h>
 #include <arpa/inet.h>
+#include <cstdlib>
 #include <iostream>
 #include <fstream>
 
--- havp/havp.cpp~      2007-04-05 06:49:12.000000000 +0000
+++ havp/havp.cpp       2007-04-05 06:49:21.000000000 +0000
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <time.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <cstdlib>
 #include <iostream>
 
 URLList Whitelist;
--- havp/proxyhandler.cpp~      2007-04-05 06:49:32.000000000 +0000
+++ havp/proxyhandler.cpp       2007-04-05 06:49:40.000000000 +0000
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include "utils.h"
 
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <cstdlib>
 #include <deque>
 #include <iostream>
 #include <fstream>

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.87-1

Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27/01/2008):
> Unfortunately, some more headers got cleaned up after I reported my
> original bug report with patch.  The good news is that there won't be
> any further changes from the side of GCC, so please compile your
> package with gcc-4.3 or gcc-snapshot from unstable to see what
> remaining issues there are.  Thanks.

I can't reproduce it with the current version, closing accordingly. In
case you can still reproduce it, please reopen and slap me in Cc.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to