Your message dated Sat, 28 May 2005 17:51:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#104392: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#104392: What exactly is
resuqsted in this bug report?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2001 00:42:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 11 19:42:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wrack.thatsnice.org [::ffff:207.111.205.202]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15KUYe-0001xe-00; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:42:20 -0500
Received: (qmail 19490 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jul 2001 00:42:16 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: passwd should include local customization like adduser/deluser
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.21
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.21
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:42:16 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: passwd
Version: 20000902-6.1
Severity: wishlist
adduser and deluser allow the admin of a machine to customize the
operation of these scripts by calling /usr/local/sbin/$0.local if it
exists. I use this to keep auth information in sync between two
machines. I need this feature for passwd as well. I don't want to
use NIS. :)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wrack 2.4.4-686-smp #1 SMP Sun Apr 29 12:50:30 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages passwd depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpam-modules 0.72-28 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam0g 0.72-28 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii login 20000902-6.1 System login tools
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 104392-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2005 15:51:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 28 08:51:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dc3au-0000LV-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 08:51:24 -0700
Received: from pamunkey.imag.fr (pamunkey.imag.fr [129.88.69.8])
by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4SFpHXX020960;
Sat, 28 May 2005 17:51:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from navajo.imag.fr (navajo.imag.fr [129.88.69.1])
by pamunkey.imag.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3/ImagV2) with ESMTP id j4SFj7e18670;
Sat, 28 May 2005 17:45:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.imag.fr ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost)
by navajo.imag.fr with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dc3hS-0004Nj-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:58:10 +0200
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dc3ag-0001KQ-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:51:10 +0200
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 17:51:10 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#104392: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#104392: What exactly is
resuqsted in this bug report?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6
(imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Sat, 28 May 2005 17:51:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:50:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:23:24AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >=20
> > > IMHO the bug originator wants just a
> > > notification/callback mechanizm to help him keep passwd
> > > in sync between several hosts.
> >=20
> >=20
> > Well, it seems to me that this is a too specific demand. Such needs
> > are probably better be handled by some local wrapper for passwd.
> >=20
>=20
> Four years later I'm a much better sysadmin than I was then (I hope),
> and I don't mind using LDAP, NIS, or some other centralized database to
> manage login information on multiple hosts.
>=20
> I don't even remember what situation prompted me to make the suggestion.
> I think Alexander is right about my original motivation, but I don't
> think it's worth anyone's time to put any energy into the feature.
>=20
> Now I'm wondering what other silly wishlist bugs I filed so long ago.
>=20
> It's fine with me if you close the bug. =20
>=20
> Thanks for the followup, though.
Ok, closing this bug report, then. Thanks for taking the time to answer the
mail.
Have a good one,
Mt.
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCmJNsIiC/MeFF8zQRAtMWAJ48DgvU67fhhXsKzwsbjXFtutEy6ACgkN7f
p5nFal2qBFT/JGxKJVPb8zw=
=nipn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
