Your message dated Sat, 28 May 2005 18:04:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311125: clamav-daemon: Add config option to skip
out-of-spec archives
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2005 21:33:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 28 14:33:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlantic.devin.com [64.62.161.58]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dc8vx-0007cZ-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 14:33:29 -0700
Received: (qmail 18734 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2005 21:33:28 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: clamav-daemon: Add config option to skip out-of-spec archives
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:33:28 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: clamav-daemon
Version: 0.84-2
Severity: wishlist
Clamd provides a number of config knobs to specify maximum sizes and file
counts and so forth in archives. However, it regards archive
files/attachments that exceed those limits as infected, rather than passing on
them. I can appreciate wanting a conservative deny-all-pass-some behavior for
some uses, but this makes trouble for others, such as the use of clamdscan in
SMTP scanners which prefer to err towards false-negative when dealing with
large attachments. For that use case, it'd be nice to have a config option or
commandline switch or something to choose between the two.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages clamav-daemon depends on:
ii clamav-base 0.84-2 base package for clamav, an anti-v
ii clamav-freshclam [clamav-da 0.84-2 downloads clamav virus databases f
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libclamav1 0.84-2 virus scanner library
ii libcurl3 7.13.2-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libgmp3 4.1.4-6 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2005 01:04:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 28 18:04:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlantic.devin.com [64.62.161.58]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcCEc-0006sZ-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 18:04:59 -0700
Received: (qmail 25078 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2005 01:04:58 -0000
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:04:58 -0700
From: Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#311125: clamav-daemon: Add config option to skip out-of-spec
archives
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9iyR+p8Z2cn535Lj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--9iyR+p8Z2cn535Lj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:37:06PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Do you have ArchiveBlockMax enabled? The behavior you describe sounds
> like you do.
Agh, you're right. Sorry, I noticed the behavior and went straight for the
code, where it on first inspection appeared to be flagging problematic
archives unconditionally.
Thanks for pointing it out. :P
--=20
Devin \ aqua(at)devin.com, IRC:Requiem; http://www.devin.com
Carraway \ 1024D/E9ABFCD2: 13E7 199E DD1E 65F0 8905 2E43 5395 CA0D E9AB FCD2
--9iyR+p8Z2cn535Lj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCmRU4U5XKDemr/NIRAnMMAJ9KxUbRiDsPT00kNLCvbITJJM/bnwCgzrTI
b2NP/OmOUeh6QL+2zRczrf0=
=kJFG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9iyR+p8Z2cn535Lj--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
