Your message dated Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:53:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: libtulip-3.0-dev: bashism in /bin/sh script
has caused the Debian Bug report #465004,
regarding libtulip-3.0-dev: bashism in /bin/sh script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
465004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libtulip-3.0-dev
Severity: important
Version: 3.0.0~B6-2
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash

Hello maintainer,

While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) 
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making 
use of a bashism.

checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/tulip-config line 39 (${parm/?/pat[/str]}):
>     thisdir=${thisdir/\/$drive\//$drive:/}


Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors. Please be aware that although 
bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to 
make dash the default /bin/sh[1].

If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh

[1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt

Thank you,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' 
> package) 
> check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making 
> use of a bashism.

Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch attached. This seems to be a little pointless, as this particular
> code is only run for WINNT installations (Debian GNU/Win32, anyone?).

Therefore I'm closing this with no changes.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Hoare's Law of Large Problems:
        Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to