Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:28:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netkit-base has been removed from Debian, closing #126113
has caused the Debian Bug report #126113,
regarding netkit-base: Missing prototype for ctime(3)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
126113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=126113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netkit-base
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-21
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
inetd.c uses ctime() without a prototype, which will likely cause
pointer corruption on ia64 (unprototyped functions are presumed
to return 32-bit ints, instead of 64-bit pointers).
I believe these prototypes may have been in sys/time.h until
recently; some change in glibc (perhaps prompted by a standards
change) may have affected this.
diff -aur netkit-base.orig/inetd/inetd.c netkit-base-0.10/inetd/inetd.c
--- netkit-base.orig/inetd/inetd.c Tue Apr 4 23:07:22 2000
+++ netkit-base-0.10/inetd/inetd.c Fri Dec 21 14:31:55 2001
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
#include <sys/file.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
+#include <time.h> /* ctime(3), time(2) */
#include <sys/resource.h>
#ifndef __linux__
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux butthead.progeny.com 2.4.9-itanium-smp #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 20:48:35
MDT 2001 ia64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.10-10.3+rm
The netkit-base package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/383960 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Barry deFreese
--- End Message ---
