Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:40:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line exim has been removed from Debian, closing #143295
has caused the Debian Bug report #143295,
regarding exim; forked process share parent context
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
143295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143295
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: exim
Version: 3.32-2
Severity: normal
See thread starting at
http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20020415/037719.html
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux mah 2.4.17-686 #2 Sat Dec 22 21:58:49 EST 2001 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages exim depends on:
ii cron 3.0pl1-71 management of regular background processing
ii libc6 2.2.4-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libdb2 2.7.7.0-1 The Berkeley database routines (run-time fil
ii libident 0.22-2 simple RFC1413 client library - runtime
ii libldap2 2.0.14-1 OpenLDAP libraries.
ii libpam0g 0.72-32 Pluggable Authentication Modules library
ii libpcre3 3.4-1.1 Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Regular Expre
ii libsasl7 1.5.24-9 Authentication abstraction library.
ii netbase 4.06 Basic TCP/IP networking system
--- Begin /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/exim (modified conffile)
Config file not present or no permissions for access
--- End /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/exim
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.36-18.2+rm
The exim package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/420191 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Barry deFreese
--- End Message ---
