Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:14:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#289068: rblcheck: rbl(1) is missing ffrom Debian
package (included in original source)
has caused the Debian Bug report #289068,
regarding rblcheck: rbl(1) is missing ffrom Debian package (included in
original source)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
289068: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289068
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rblcheck
Version: 20020316-5
Severity: normal
A shell script 'rbl' is missing from the Debian packaging. It uses
system wide /etc/rblcheckrc and ~/.rblcheckrc to pass default options
to rblcheck(1).
Standard install in the original package sources install 'rbl'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages rblcheck depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Jan 07, Jari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A shell script 'rbl' is missing from the Debian packaging. It uses
> system wide /etc/rblcheckrc and ~/.rblcheckrc to pass default options
> to rblcheck(1).
It's a trivial script with a generic name, it's not being installed by
choice.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
