Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:13:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#109188: add sanity check to avoid blocking 127.0.0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #109188,
regarding add sanity check to avoid blocking 127.0.0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
109188: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=109188
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rblcheck
Version: 20010424-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The recent ORBS trouble with 127.0.0.1 being blocked got me to add the
attached patch to my local rblcheck binary. Please consider
adding/forwarding it upstream...
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux godzillah.khazad-dum.debian.net 2.2.19 #1 Thu Mar 29 19:31:38 BRT
2001 i586
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR
Versions of packages rblcheck depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--- rblcheck.c.orig Sat Aug 18 23:36:59 2001
+++ rblcheck.c Sat Aug 18 23:57:23 2001
@@ -317,8 +317,14 @@
!strlen( response ) ) ) ? "" : "\n" ) );
if( response )
{
- count++;
free( response );
+ if ( a == 127 && b == 0 && c == 0 && d == 1 )
+ {
+ if ( !quiet )
+ printf ( "Match for 127.0.0.1
ignored...\n" );
+ } else {
+ count++;
+ }
}
if( firstmatch && count )
return count;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Aug 19, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The recent ORBS trouble with 127.0.0.1 being blocked got me to add the
> attached patch to my local rblcheck binary. Please consider
> adding/forwarding it upstream...
History showed that this kind of issues is not common, so I am closing
this bug. I see rblcheck more as a shell tool than the component of a
MTA, anyway.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
