Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:58:12 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #364971,
regarding "vrms and RMS disagree sometimes... AND depends on non-free section
presence..."
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
364971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vrms
Version: 1.7
Severity: minor
Current plans are to move documentation published under the GFDL
to non-free. Thus, many GNU manuals, including some written by
RMS, will be moved to non-free.
Current vrms behaviour will then be to complain about them, even though
RMS happens to thoroughly approve of them.
Does this remain a good name?
(Okay, this is a stupid bug report.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The purpose of vrms is to identify packages Debian makes available in the
non-free and contrib distributions. The fact that this boundary may no longer
precisely match the boundary of freedom that RMS espouses is not a bug in the
vrms program, per se.
Bdale
--- End Message ---
