Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:31:31 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#477568: base-files: common-licenses/BSD declares a 
copyright which does not apply to most packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #477568,
regarding base-files: common-licenses/BSD declares a copyright which does not 
apply to most packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
477568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 4.0.3
Severity: serious

The base-files package includes the three-clause BSD license, however, it
asserts the following copyright:

    Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.

This copyright should be removed, as it is not valid for most packages in
Debian: most BSD-licensed software is not copyright by the copyright holders
of BSD itself.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii  base-passwd                   3.5.17     Debian base system master password
ii  mawk [awk]                    1.3.3-11   a pattern scanning and text proces

base-files recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, William Pitcock wrote:

> Package: base-files
> Version: 4.0.3
> Severity: serious
> 
> The base-files package includes the three-clause BSD license, however, it
> asserts the following copyright:
> 
>     Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.
> 
> This copyright should be removed, as it is not valid for most packages in
> Debian: most BSD-licensed software is not copyright by the copyright holders
> of BSD itself.

IMHO, the wording indicates that this has never been a generic BSD license,
but a BSD license for works from the University of California. In fact,
debian-policy says "UCB BSD license".

If you want to change this, get a consensus on debian-policy first, as
explained in base-files FAQ. You may reopen and reassign to
debian-policy if you wish.

Thanks.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to