Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:02:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241913: fixed in ettercap 1:0.7.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 19:25:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 03 11:25:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.deusystems.com (deusystems.cz) [212.80.75.66]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9qlb-0006oo-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:25:19 -0800
Received: (qmail 27836 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2004 18:27:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.haltyr.bohnice.centrum.czf) (10.10.8.133)
by kerberos.deusystems.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2004 18:27:31 -0000
Received: from jan by mail.haltyr.bohnice.centrum.czf with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1B9qjd-0006cM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 21:23:17 +0200
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 21:23:17 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ettercap: Should work with ifaces with no IP address assigned
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jan Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: ettercap
Version: 1:0.6.4-1
Severity: important
Hi!
There is no need for an IP address for many duties ettercap can be
employed in: When listening passively, there is no need to transmit
anything, so no IP address is ever used. When actively injecting non-IP
addresses, no IP address is needed. Even when the IP address _is_ to be
written to the wire, a random one can be generated--in fact, the
requirement for an IP address being in place forces the user to do
exactly that: to assign a random/user specified address.
ettercap should not require an IP address to be assigned to the
interface it's about to work with. When needed, ettercap should have
the ability to fill the IP address field in the packets it sends. This
address would be specified on the commandline/in the conffile/from
within the UI/&c., and/or generated at random when possible.
Cheers,
Jan.
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAbw8l+uczK20Fa5cRApmrAJ48AOtlDeeeGTjeMXpJXwke9sGcSwCg1epZ
bG6UrC5jMkc1hrd/VDsz91A=
=cAt5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 241913-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 16:08:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 09:08:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfK9E-0002ko-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:08:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfK3Y-00045A-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:02:28 -0400
From: Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#241913: fixed in ettercap 1:0.7.3-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:02:28 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: ettercap
Source-Version: 1:0.7.3-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ettercap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ettercap-common_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap-common_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
ettercap-gtk_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap-gtk_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
ettercap_0.7.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap_0.7.3-1.diff.gz
ettercap_0.7.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap_0.7.3-1.dsc
ettercap_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
ettercap_0.7.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/ettercap/ettercap_0.7.3.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ettercap package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:07:06 +0300
Source: ettercap
Binary: ettercap-gtk ettercap ettercap-common
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.7.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ettercap - Multipurpose sniffer/interceptor/logger for switched LAN
ettercap-common - Common support files and plugins for ettercap
ettercap-gtk - Multipurpose sniffer/interceptor/logger for switched LAN
Closes: 241913 270978
Changes:
ettercap (1:0.7.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #270978 #156770 #312226 #205624)
* It's forwarded current ettercap developers long time ago (Closes: #241913)
Files:
4862e5fc7fd89dd75d8bab63fac61e96 734 net optional ettercap_0.7.3-1.dsc
3683c0512485cc1badc562815fbdd373 1148766 net optional
ettercap_0.7.3.orig.tar.gz
dd61dda2cd4ce4c218f02a6b8fe7f7a8 3833 net optional ettercap_0.7.3-1.diff.gz
2498ca58aa7689043232c01e5d73cea9 293120 net optional
ettercap-common_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
898473e02dac0d86e0b876b4e83b48b7 174712 net optional ettercap_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
4c471e1c93517de272c219ba9d9e798d 212104 net optional
ettercap-gtk_0.7.3-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCpG9LAJWfo5xHjUkRAtg9AJ4kpMhr7plFa/Pi6irpd1jXYrqEggCgsbHN
7l+MwCnzpJ6lHnv5QHNWsZQ=
=BNoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
