Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:56:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xmms has been removed from Debian, closing #272913
has caused the Debian Bug report #272913,
regarding would I be nuts if I asked for a xmms-lib package?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
272913: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272913
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: wishlist
hi, I'd like to know if the possibility of having an xmms-lib package
has ever been considered, either having xmms Depend: on it or
Conflict: with it.
I plainly ignore how many packages this would be useful for, other
than the one I'm packaging atm (amarok). currently, I can only do one
of these:
(1) disable xmms support
(2) enable it and make an audio player *depend* on another audio
player (à-la-galeon)
(3) enable it but prevent the Depends: xmms from being generated
I'm considering #3, but I thought it'd be nice to have a xmms-lib
package with just /usr/lib/libxmms*.
any comment welcome, specially rationale for not creating it if that
is the case.
thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Leonard Cohen - Tower of song
From the moment I picked your book up until I put it down I was
convulsed with laughter. Some day I intend reading it.
-- Groucho Marx
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.2.10+20070601-1+rm
The xmms package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/461309 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
