Your message dated Fri, 30 May 2008 15:34:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bigloo has been removed from Debian, closing #434204
has caused the Debian Bug report #434204,
regarding bigloo-ude: causes errors if removed, but not deconfigured
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
434204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bigloo-ude
Version: 2.8c-6
Severity: normal

Hello,

when bigloo-ude is removed but not deconfigured, it still installs its
hooks. This results in messages like

run-hooks: Cannot open load file: cee-hook

when entering c++-mode

Regards
    Jiri Palecek

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.3-rt8 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to cs_CZ)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages bigloo-ude depends on:
ii  bigloo                        2.8c-6     A practical Scheme compiler
ii  emacs21                       21.4a+1-5  The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" util

bigloo-ude recommends no packages.


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.8c-6+rm

The bigloo package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/475720 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to