Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:01:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line autofs: /etc/init.d/autofs reload does not reload auto.master
timeout changes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2005 14:44:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 15 06:44:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp83-237-169-42.pppoe.mtu-net.ru (wizzle.ran.pp.ru)
[83.237.169.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cpp9p-0004aI-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:44:06 -0800
Received: by wizzle.ran.pp.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EBC4221009; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:43:35 +0300 (MSK)
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: autofs: /etc/init.d/autofs reload does not reload auto.master
timeout changes
X-Debbugs-CC: Artem Chuprina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Artem Chuprina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:43:35 +0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.3-8
Severity: minor
/etc/init.d/autofs reload does not check for timeout changes in
auto.master (AFAIR it checks only for addition and removal of mount
points, not changes like timeout or common mount options) and there is
no indication of this neither in /etc/init.d/autofs nor in
README.Debian. Maybe it does not worth powder and shot to handle these
cases but it is very reasonable to warn admin. So I suggest the
following patch:
--- /etc/init.d/autofs 2004-12-20 19:25:11.000000000 +0300
+++ autofs 2005-01-15 17:36:27.000000000 +0300
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@
echo "done."
;;
reload)
- echo "Reloading automounter: checking for changes ... "
+ echo "Reloading automounter: checking for additions/removals (not
changes) of mount points ... "
TMP=`mktemp -t autofs.XXXXXX`
getmounts >$TMP
for i in /var/run/autofs/*.pid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-wizzle
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Versions of packages autofs depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
Artem Chuprina
RFC2822: <ran{}ran.pp.ru> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290632-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 00:01:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 10 17:01:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DgtR5-0004XH-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:01:15 -0700
Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32])
by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DgtR1-0008Vk-4v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:01:13 +0200
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DgtR0-0004T8-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:01:10 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 02:01:10 +0200
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: autofs: /etc/init.d/autofs reload does not reload auto.master
timeout changes
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11.8 on a i686
X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:51:47AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Could you check if this is still the case in the new 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-1 I
> uploaded to unstable? There have been lots of changes to the init scripts.
OK, I checked -- this bug definitely does not exist in the current versions
of autofs, so I'm closing it.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
