Your message dated Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:08:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#483731: auctex: postinst failed with emacs-snapshot
has caused the Debian Bug report #483731,
regarding auctex: postinst failed with emacs-snapshot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
483731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483731
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: auctex
Version: 11.83-7.1
Severity: serious
Installation failed with the following message, after "apt-get install
auctex":
---<---------------cut here---------------start-------------->---
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
Setting up auctex (11.83-7.1) ...
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs-snapshot (log file:
/usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex//CompilationLog)...
emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex
emacs-snapshot emacs-snapshot emacs22 failed at
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, <TSORT> line 1.
dpkg: error processing auctex (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
auctex
---<---------------cut here---------------end---------------->---
rendering the package unuseable. Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages auctex depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii emacs-snapshot 1:20080530-1 The GNU Emacs editor (development
ii emacs22 22.2+2-2 The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.81-4 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii preview-latex-style 11.83-7.1 extraction of elements from LaTeX
Versions of packages auctex recommends:
ii acroread [pdf-viewer] 8.1.2-0.3 Adobe Acrobat Reader: Portable Doc
ii doc-base 0.8.16 utilities to manage online documen
ii evince [pdf-viewer] 2.22.1.1-3 Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii ghostscript-x [gs-gpl] 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii gv [pdf-viewer] 1:3.6.3dfsg-6 PostScript and PDF viewer for X
ii kghostview [pdf-viewer] 4:3.5.9-1+b2 PostScript viewer for KDE
ii kpdf [pdf-viewer] 4:3.5.9-1+b2 PDF viewer for KDE
ii texlive-latex-recommende 2007-14 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag
ii xpdf-reader [pdf-viewer] 3.02-1.3 Portable Document Format (PDF) sui
ii xpdf-utils [pdf-viewer] 3.02-1.3 Portable Document Format (PDF) sui
-- debconf information:
auctex/doauto: Background
auctex/logfile: /tmp/update-auctex-elisp.IA24735
auctex/doautofg: File
--
Seb
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[I'm closing this bug.]
>>>>> DK == David Kastrup [2008-6-4]
DK> The upstream AUCTeX maintainer (well, I) wants to leave things as they
DK> are. Next time this problem triggers, we will be able to report it
DK> timely to Emacs upstream.
Recorded.
DK> One problem with coding cookies is that the files are also compiled when
DK> using XEmacs, and XEmacs partly has different coding names. So a change
DK> here could also break things, while merely pasting over a transitory
DK> problem.
Sane idea.
--
Thanks, Davide
--- End Message ---
