Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:39:02 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.15.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2002 20:17:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 24 15:17:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from square.phys.uu.nl (square.localdomain) [131.211.34.218] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17BLVL-0005Kp-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 15:17:39 -0500
Received: from jeroen by square.localdomain with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17BLVI-0007Qv-00; Fri, 24 May 2002 22:17:36 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tar: SIGSEGV on unreadeable directory with -g
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 22:17:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tar
Version: 1.13.25-3
Severity: normal
When doing a tar with -g option enabled, it will segfault when it
encouters a directory which is unreadable to the current process.
Reproduce:
mkdir -m 0 test ; tar cg /dev/null test
--Jeroen
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux square 2.4.17 #1 SMP Wed Feb 6 23:29:15 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=POSIX
Versions of packages tar depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 148074-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 05:38:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 22:38:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiQc1-0003dU-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:38:53 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76426C471;
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:38:53 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from winfree.gag.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (winfree [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 24804-02; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:38:52 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from rover.gag.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018F0C3AE;
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:38:52 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4D37FE6D09; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:39:02 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in 1.15.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:39:02 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at gag.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Testing with 1.15.1 confirms that these problems no longer exist.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
