Your message dated Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:48:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: gmessage: Please make gmessage an alternative to xmessage
has caused the Debian Bug report #339832,
regarding gmessage: Please make gmessage an alternative to xmessage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
339832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gmessage
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Since gmessage and xmessage are mostly compatible, it would be nice if
/etc/alternatives/xmessage existed and allowed the admin to choose
between xmessage and gmessage (if installed).
- -Roberto
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-miami-16
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gmessage depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
di libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface
di libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDfqQEjqO5DLK5e7ERAmXKAKCYQoNfzFyBWbn+cOU4tYYag+uf3wCgiF2z
/nTnk3Hz1MAM+PSybMHte3w=
=gLdw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:34:12AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=16;bug=339832
>
> Are you interested in writing a patch ? If not, then please consider
> closing the bug.
>
Bart,
I've been thinking about this on and off since you pinged me. I think
at the time I envisioned greater utility in this than really exists. I
am closing the bug.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---