Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314274: base-files: dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 13:43:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 06:43:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (bulma.condor-werke.com) [193.158.67.67]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiYBP-0005XC-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:43:55 -0700
Received: from amavis by bulma.condor-werke.com with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1DiY78-0006d4-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:39:30 +0200
Received: from prometheus.condor-werke.com ([192.168.3.2] ident=Debian-exim)
by bulma.condor-werke.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DiY77-0006cu-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:39:29 +0200
Received: from hwilmer by prometheus.condor-werke.com with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DiY77-0002bl-L7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:39:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Hans Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: base-files: dependency problem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:39:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-condor-werke.com-Virus-Scanned: by bulma.condor-werke.com w/ amavisd
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.2-0.0.0.2.pure64
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The base-files package appears insufficiently recent. I�ve got dependency
problems against the libc6 package because libc6 is more recent than the
base-file packages allows. The libc6 package cannot be upgraded without
removing other required packages.
This makes some 75 packages being hold back from being upgraded and has
resulted in the remove of the amanda packages which I need to run the daily
backups ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii base-passwd 3.5.9 Debian base system master password
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.2.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-11 a pattern scanning and text proces
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314274-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 14:20:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 07:20:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiYko-0002Pz-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:20:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id DC4DAA1C6B; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 22818-10; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:21:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id 64875A1C70; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
by guadiana.unex.es with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DiYkm-0004cU-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:20:28 +0200
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hans Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#314274: base-files: dependency problem
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Hans Wilmer wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 3.1.2-0.0.0.2.pure64
> [...]
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
I'm sorry, but this is not the base-files package I maintain.
Talk to the amd64 porters who had to modify the base-files package
for the amd64 port, this is not my problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
