Your message dated Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:37:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#418997: /usr/bin/ldapsearch: ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI
segfaults
has caused the Debian Bug report #418997,
regarding /usr/bin/ldapsearch: ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI segfaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
418997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418997
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ldap-utils
Version: 2.3.30-5
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/ldapsearch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:31:39 ~> klist
Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000_svvwJa
Principal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Issued Expires Principal
Apr 13 09:40:27 Apr 13 19:40:27 krbtgt/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:31:43 ~> ldapsearch -x uid=juhaj cn
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base <> with scope subtree
# filter: uid=juhaj
# requesting: cn
#
# juhaj, People, tfy.utu.fi
dn: uid=juhaj,ou=People,dc=tfy,dc=utu,dc=fi
cn:: SnVoYSBKw6R5a2vDpA==
# search result
search: 2
result: 0 Success
# numResponses: 2
# numEntries: 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:31:49 ~> ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI uid=juhaj cn
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:31:49 ~>
Need I say more?
For what it's worth, here's /etc/ldap/ldap.conf
BASE dc=tfy,dc=utu,dc=fi
URI <three machines listed with ldap://machine.fully.qualified.domain.name>
SASL_REALM TFY.UTU.FI
SASL_MECH GSSAPI
TLS_CACERTDIR /etc/ssl/certs
There's TLS_CACERTDIR, but the connection in question is ldap://, not
ldaps://.
-Juha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17+juhaj+v1.0 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages ldap-utils depends on:
ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libldap-2.3-0 2.3.30-5 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libsasl2-2 2.1.22.dfsg1-8 Authentication abstraction library
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8e-4 SSL shared libraries
Versions of packages ldap-utils recommends:
ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.22.dfsg1-8 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:55:10AM +0300, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
> > I've just done a test here with etch ldap-utils, etch slapd, and etch
> This was never an etch issue, but then-current sid. I cannot tell
> (anymore) if the version was the same as in etch at the time, now it
> definitely is not the same and...
Oh, interesting; well, I gues sthings hadn't changed much between the etch
release and your bug report, because almost all of the package versions
reportbug showed for you exactly matched the etch versions. :)
> > libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit. I'm not able to reproduce any segfaults when
>
> neither can I, so please close the bug. It seems to have gone away on its
> own.
> (No wonder: the version has gone from 2.3.30 to 2.4.10 meanwhile.)
> Thanks for digging up such an old bug, anyway! I guess the BTS is full of
> similar ages-old bugs which no longer affect anyone. Had I just recalled the
> whole thing, I would have suggested closing the bug when it no longer
> affected me.
Ok. Thank you for the quick follow-up (unlike the slow turnaround on our
part :)!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
