Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:52:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line yard has been removed from Debian, closing #163776
has caused the Debian Bug report #163776,
regarding write_rescue_disk: blocks_for_other_files too small
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
163776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=163776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: yard
Version: 2.2-3
Severity: normal

In write_rescue_disk the blocks_for_other_files are hardcoded to 35.
This was to small (by 1 block) in my case. Please either increase the
hardcoded block count or include a configuration option.

Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pingo 2.4.19+preempt+lowlat #1 Mon Oct 7 23:05:02 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages yard depends on:
ii  binutils                   2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  coreutils [fileutils]      4.5.1-2       The GNU core utilities
ii  file                       3.39-1        Determines file type using "magic"
ii  fileutils                  4.5.1-2       GNU file management utilities
ii  perl                       5.8.0-13      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2-5+rm

The yard package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/484976 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to