Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:53:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#489286: mutt: incorrect and private information 
provided to reportbug
has caused the Debian Bug report #489286,
regarding mutt: incorrect and private information provided to reportbug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
489286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.18-2
Severity: important

When I report a bug with reportbug, incorrect and private information
is included in the bug report under "Package-specific info", because
as I *also* have my own version of Mutt, the wrong mutt is run (note:
I saw it and changed it in my previous bug report).

In /usr/share/bug/mutt/script,

LC_ALL=C mutt -v >&3

should be changed to:

LC_ALL=C /usr/bin/mutt -v >&3

since Debian's mutt is installed there.

-- Package-specific info:
[deleted]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25.8-20080623 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii  libc6                    2.7-12          GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgdbm3                 1.8.3-3         GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libgnutls26              2.4.1-1         the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libidn11                 1.8+20080606-1  GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libncursesw5             5.6+20080621-2  shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsasl2-2               2.1.22.dfsg1-21 Cyrus SASL - authentication abstra

Versions of packages mutt recommends:
ii  exim4                         4.69-5     meta-package to ease Exim MTA (v4)
ii  exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.69-5+b1  lightweight Exim MTA (v4) daemon
ii  locales                       2.7-12     GNU C Library: National Language (
ii  mime-support                  3.44-1     MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap

Versions of packages mutt is related to:
ii  mutt                          1.5.18-2   text-based mailreader supporting M
pn  mutt-dbg                      <none>     (no description available)
pn  mutt-patched                  <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Re: Vincent Lefevre 2008-07-04 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> When I report a bug with reportbug, incorrect and private information
> is included in the bug report under "Package-specific info", because
> as I *also* have my own version of Mutt, the wrong mutt is run (note:
> I saw it and changed it in my previous bug report).

Hi Vincent,

the fact that many people have their own mutt version installed is the
very reason we do *not* use /usr/bin/mutt there. If the bug reported
is caused by extra patches in a local version, we'd like to know that.

Every bug report leaks information about a system. I don't think mutt
-v is worse than the other bits mutt (and other packages) already
include. If a submitter doesn't like it, or the information is not
relevant, they can delete it. If here's anything to fix, reportbug
should be updated to ask if it may include these bits.

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to