Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:06:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#491301: kernel menu entries are misordered
has caused the Debian Bug report #491301,
regarding kernel menu entries are misordered
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
491301: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491301
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080704-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
grub-pc has recently started mis-ordering my kernels...
linux-image-2.6.26.0rx00 is before linux-image-2.6.26.0rx01 (of course
rx01 is a later version)
linux-image-2.6.26.0rx00 is after linux-image-2.6.26.0mn00
(alphabetically rx is a greater version than mn)
It does the right thing with major versions, but just stops there...
Thanks,
Guido
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.0rx01 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages grub-pc depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii grub-common 1.96+20080704-2 GRand Unified Bootloader, version
ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii liblzo2-2 2.03-1 data compression library
ii libncurses5 5.6+20080308-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
grub-pc recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
grub-pc/linux_cmdline: fillme
grub-pc/chainload_from_menu.lst: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:18:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi,
> 'm' is smaller than 'r'. This change was done intentionaly to mimic the
> criteria used in GRUB Legacy's version of update-grub.
But that's the point... m is smaller than r, so r is a *higher version* than m,
which means it should be preferred, shouldn't... Even more true for 01, 02,
etc... If I update some kernel configuration (which version was 00) and create a
01 or 02 I'd like those to be booted first, don't I? Or should I give it a lower
version to make sure it's put first?
Ciao!!
Guido
--- End Message ---
