Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:12:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cons adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 12:25:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 05:25:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiATp-0002Eo-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:25:21 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7930564D55; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 12F877FF6; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:25:12 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:25:12 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can you get rid of your build-dependency on cons?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: atom4
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: important
Your package is the only one which still has a build-dependency on
cons. cons has been orphaned since August 2003 (665 days ago) so
it seems unlikely that it will be adopted soon. Since I intend
to remove cons from the archive, it would be good if you could
replace this build-dependency soon.
Do you think that's possible?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 313570-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 22:13:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 15:13:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd2mo2so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dj2bs-0000b9-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:13:16 -0700
Received: from pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd3mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.179]) by l-daemon
(Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:12:36 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.152])
by pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:12:36 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from crystal (S0106000c6e9a4bd7.vc.shawcable.net [24.85.235.15])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
16 Jun 2005 16:12:36 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from hsteoh by crystal with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1Dj2bB-00070y-VE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
16 Jun 2005 15:12:33 -0700
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:12:33 -0700
From: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cons adopted
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FAKE_HELO_SHAW_CA
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
I just adopted cons and uploaded the latest package, so I'm closing
this bug now. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. :-)
T
--
"No, John. I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over-featured
megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links
in forms which are hideously over-complex." -- Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
