Your message dated Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:57:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl (build-) depends on
libxsloader-perl
has caused the Debian Bug report #480837,
regarding libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl (build-) depends on libxsloader-perl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
480837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl
Version: 0.005-1
Severity: important
Hi Ivan,
your package still (build-) depends on libxsloader-perl.
The latter has, as you know, become a virtual package. As such, I think
that you need to change the (build-) dependencies to
perl-base (>= 5.10) | libxsloader-perl.
Kind regards
T.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:53:41AM +0000, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Package: libcrypt-eksblowfish-perl
> > Version: 0.005-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > your package still (build-) depends on libxsloader-perl.
> > The latter has, as you know, become a virtual package. As such, I
> > think that you need to change the (build-) dependencies to
> > perl-base (>= 5.10) | libxsloader-perl.
>
> Why?
>
> Wasn't the whole point of having perl-modules Provide:
> libxsloader-perl that dependant packages *wouldn't* have to update
> their build-deps to be buildable against 5.10? Otherwise, why
> bother?
I did not hear back from you regarding this, so I am closing the bug.
--
_ivan
--- End Message ---
