Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:54:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: #463378 smbfs: Cannot tonnect to Win98 host
has caused the Debian Bug report #463378,
regarding smbfs: Cannot tonnect to Win98 host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
463378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.28-2+b1
Severity: normal
I cannot mout shares from Win98 Hosts since only "cifs" is tryed which does
not support Win98.
The filesystem "smbfs" seems to be ignored by smbfs package.
This breaks networking.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-mywin4lin (PREEMPT)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages smbfs depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii netbase 4.30 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii samba-common 3.0.28-2+b1 Samba common files used by both th
smbfs recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 12:29 +0200 schrieb Elmar Haneke:
> You can mark the bug as closed. Tagging as "wontfix" does not make any
> difference for me.
>
> Currently I downgraded to 3.0.27a-1 until I can upgrade my Kernel.
OK. Closing this bug.
> > smbfs is still (and will be) removed from samba and kernel 2.6.27 will
> > remove it too.
> >
> > cifs is the replacement but you need a newer kernel for this.
> > If this is not possible on your side I see nothing we can do for you
> > because upstream (samba and kernel) removed/is removing smbfs.
> >
> > I would like to close the bug because there is nothing we can do.
> > Or do you prefer to get it tagged "wontfix" which isn't the case IMHO.
--
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--- End Message ---
