Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:11:27 -0300 (ART)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #450952,
regarding Optional dependency on xinetd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
450952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Optional dependency on xinetd
Package: amanda
Version: 1:2.5.2p1-1
amanda-common provides /etc/xinetd.d/amanda file. Could it be possible
to add xinetd as an optional dependency for openbsd-inetd ?
Thank you.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Since amanda-common depends on "openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver", I believe
there is no bug here. If xinetd becomes the default someday, reworking this
dependency to specify it as the first option might become reasonable.
Bdale
--- End Message ---
