Your message dated Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#460164: #460164 smbfs: Recursive
directory listing with CIFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #460164,
regarding smbfs: Recursive directory listing with CIFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
460164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460164
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.28-1
Severity: important
With the upgrade to 3.0.28-1, I am now unable to use any Windows shares
mounted from a Windows 2003 Server using DFS. This is because CIFS does
not yet fully support DFS and the SMBFS-related scripts that I was using
have
been replaced with forwarders to CIFS.
When I mount a Windows share from such a server, I am able to see the
top-level directories in this share, but if I 'ls' any of these
directories, I get another list of the top-level directories.
Please consider keeping SMBFS support available until CIFS is able to
replace all reasonable uses of SMBFS. As things stand today, I am
completely unable to access any Windows shares on my company's network.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers sterling
APT policy: (500, 'sterling'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages smbfs depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii netbase 4.30 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii samba-common 3.0.28-1 Samba common files used by both
th
smbfs recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Randy Coulman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.2.1-1
Quoting Randy Coulman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Anyway, it looks like 2.6.26-1 is the first Debian kernel version that
> > enables the DFS upcall support.
> >
>
> I can now confirm that the 2.6.26 kernel, along with Samba 3.2.1 does indeed
> fix DFS support in my company's configuration. I did not have to make any
> changes to /etc/request-key.conf to make it work.
So, apparently, that bug can be close wit appropriate version-tagging.
Thansk a lot for following up to this.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
