Your message dated Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:24:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux86 seems to work on 64 bit
has caused the Debian Bug report #494038,
regarding RM: linux86 [alpha amd64 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ANAIS; Package isn't
64 bit clean
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
494038: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the builds above. linux86 isn't 64 bit clean, I've
restricted the set of architectures in my 0.16.17-2.1 NMU.
I've cloned a wishlist bug so that people can port it afte Lenny
release.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 471404 0.16.17-2
thanks
[resend that was to the wrong -done and I'm also trying to improve the
version annotation]
Hi,
the differences observed in bug #471404 that lead the submitter to the
conclusion that linux86 produces wrong code on 64 bit systems are, at
least for vgabios a timestamp and a checksum. A sloppy test (because
bochs doesn't built indeps on non-i386 without convincing) shows that
bochsbios differs only ~150 bytes, too.
As such, I'll upload a revert of 0.16.17-2.1.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--- End Message ---
