Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:31:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315265: clamav-freshsclam: impossible to install.
dependency failed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 15:20:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 08:20:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns0.aygalenq.net (debian1) [82.66.199.113]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkkXu-0006lk-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:20:14 -0700
Received: by debian1 (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0C806B3310; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:19:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jissou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: clamav-freshsclam: impossible to install. dependency failed.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:19:42 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: clamav-freshsclam
Version: 0.85.2-0.86rc1-1
Severity: normal
Impossible to install the package.
Dependency are failed.
it depends on clamav-base (= 0.85.2-0.86rc1-1)
but backport-0.83-1 is installed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 315265-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 21:31:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 14:31:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lobefin.net [216.158.52.98] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DkqKy-0007dK-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:31:16 -0700
Received: from lobefin.net
([216.158.52.108] helo=www.lobefin.net ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lobefin.net with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1DkqKx-00012q-Gy; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:31:15 -0400
Received: from steve by www.lobefin.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DkqKw-0004ee-P9; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:31:14 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:31:14 -0400
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jissou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#315265: clamav-freshsclam: impossible to install. dependency
failed.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3
X-OS: Linux hadrian 2.6.8-2-686-smp i686
X-Uptime: 10 days
X-Latin: Hodie undecimo Kalendas Iulias MMDCCLVIII ab urbe condita est
X-Date: Today is Boomtime, the 26th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3171
X-DDate: Only 2431069 Shopping Days Left Before X-Day. Hail Eris!
X-Motto: debian/rules
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Authenticated-Sender: steve
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV at mail.lobefin.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This one time, at band camp, jissou said:
> Package: clamav-freshsclam
> Version: 0.85.2-0.86rc1-1
> Severity: normal
>=20
> Impossible to install the package.
> Dependency are failed.
> it depends on clamav-base (=3D 0.85.2-0.86rc1-1)=20
> but backport-0.83-1 is installed.
>=20
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
> Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
You are mixing official an dunofficial repositories. I am happy to
help, but the fact that you have version problems is hardly the fault of
the package. I suggest if you are going to grab packages from unstable,
you should grab all of the clam packages from unstable at the same time.
They have a fairly tight version dependency on purpose, and it will
break if you try to mix and match across versions.
I am closing this report, as it is not a problem with the packages. If
you would like help with sorting out your dependency problems, feel free
to write me back, write to [email protected], or join us at
#debian or #clamav on IRC.
Take care,
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCuIciSYIMHOpZA44RAoVzAKC0WrCQQAVowGtvgn+17gq0g9WJLQCg5K3A
MvOr7xui6qTyX4MfHUsYdkc=
=Rw1+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
