Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:56:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Definitely not a spamassassin bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 15:12:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 08:12:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from freedom.dicea.unifi.it [150.217.9.3] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DkkQ4-000301-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:12:08 -0700
Received: from leo by freedom.dicea.unifi.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DkkQ1-0006iC-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:12:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: spamassassin: removing with dselect take away even mailman
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:12:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: normal


On removing, via dselect, spamassassin even mailman (that suggest, but does
not depen on) is removed.
just a packaging bug .... 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages spamassassin depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.30.13  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl           2.10-1     NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii  libhtml-parser-perl           3.45-2     A collection of modules that parse
ii  perl [libstorable-perl]       5.8.4-8    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  spamc                         3.0.3-1    Client for SpamAssassin spam filte

-- debconf information:
  spamassassin/upgrade/2.40:
  spamassassin/upgrade/2.40w:
  spamassassin/upgrade/cancel: Continue
  spamassassin/upgrade/2.42m: No
  spamassassin/upgrade/2.42u: No
y

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 315259-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 02:56:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 19:56:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DkvQ5-0002IT-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 19:56:53 -0700
Received: (qmail 20704 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2005 02:56:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gold.daf.ddts.net) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@24.156.103.196 with login)
  by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2005 02:56:22 -0000
Received: from duncf by gold.daf.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DkvPF-0004dY-B6
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:56:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:56:01 -0400
From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Definitely not a spamassassin bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If mailman is removed when spamassassin is removed than either mailman
Depends/Recommends on spamassassin or there is a bug in dselect. The
former is not true, unless you have an unusual version of mailman. The
latter would very much surprise me.

If you can reproduce the problem, file a bug against dselect. I would
imagine there is something wrong on your end.


--=20
Duncan Findlay

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCuNNBqjUzNGvmnNARAvaRAJwIvihm38rNAIJAY02c9ZhHI0KekgCg1IWQ
xvdEJY1US7MIRE+I/rDfojM=
=WE4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to