Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:11:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#493559: error "rsync: on remote machine: -: unknown
option"
has caused the Debian Bug report #493559,
regarding error "rsync: on remote machine: -: unknown option"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
493559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rsync
Version: 3.0.3-2
Severity: normal
if i run
rsync rsync.kernel.org::pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.26.1
./linux-ChangeLog-2.6.26.1
i get this:
[MOTD snipped]
rsync: on remote machine: -: unknown option
rsync error: requested action not supported (code 4) at clientserver.c(685)
[sender=2.6.9]
rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(794)
[receiver=3.0.3]
now, if i add just one -v switch to the command line, it magically works.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages rsync depends on:
ii base-files 4.0.4 Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii libacl1 2.2.47-2 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.7-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libpopt0 1.14-4 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii lsb-base 3.2-16 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Confusion, chaos, panic - my work here is done.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat 13 Sep 2008, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> works for me now. you would have had to be faster to collect some
> data. ;)
Yes, sorry about that :-)
I'll close it now, as it can't be reproduced.
Feel free to open a new bug if you have trouble again, I'll try to
respond sooner then...
Paul Slootman
--- End Message ---
