Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:17:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line shaper has been removed from Debian, closing #316349
has caused the Debian Bug report #316349,
regarding /usr/share/doc/shaper/README.shaper.gz: Reference to cache in
documentation is incorrect for Debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
316349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: shaper
Version: 2.2.12-0.7.3-1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/shaper/README.shaper.gz
David,
thank you for maintaining shaper for Debian. I appreciate your work.
Just wanted to bring a minor issue to your attention. README.shaper.gz
says in one of the first few paragraphs that caching is done in
/var/cache/cbq.init which does not appear to be the case for a Debian
system. I assume that /var/cache/shaper/ is the correct place. It would
be nice if the documentation were to be updated.
Regards
Rolf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26.server041120
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages shaper depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the
-- debconf information:
* shaper/kernel-modules:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2.12-0.7.3-2.3+rm
The shaper package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/500594 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
