Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:47:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315564: fixed in nanoblogger 3.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 15:17:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 08:17:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (holland.truelite.it) [62.94.208.119]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlTS5-0004Bc-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:17:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by holland.truelite.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5173E784;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:06:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from holland.truelite.it ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (holland [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 24935-03-6; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:06:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zorn (unknown [192.168.2.1])
by holland.truelite.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD133E4FF;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:06:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by zorn (Postfix, from userid 1005)
id 43F0C5A9AF; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New upstream release
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:18:23 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at truelite.it
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nanoblogger
Severity: wishlist
Last release is 3.2.3 thet fixes also some "interesting" bugs. :-)
Thanks
Christian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 315564-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2005 00:52:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 17:52:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DmLNS-0000Vb-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:52:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DmLIw-0007J1-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:47:22 -0400
From: William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315564: fixed in nanoblogger 3.2.3-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:47:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: nanoblogger
Source-Version: 3.2.3-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nanoblogger, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.diff.gz
nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.dsc
nanoblogger_3.2.3-1_all.deb
to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.2.3-1_all.deb
nanoblogger_3.2.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.2.3.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nanoblogger package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:12:10 -0500
Source: nanoblogger
Binary: nanoblogger
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
nanoblogger - small weblog engine for the UNIX command line
Closes: 315037 315564
Changes:
nanoblogger (3.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (Closes: #315564).
* New path to the documentation (Closes: #315037).
Files:
e38de6914fe7fdd6e00425319b4ee47a 576 web optional nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.dsc
bd9f5f9d48b9b666f7bd03c76d90a724 54672 web optional
nanoblogger_3.2.3.orig.tar.gz
07a14e34a76f284ee273ea73747b7150 3314 web optional nanoblogger_3.2.3-1.diff.gz
788825608e1fe9fb6250dbcc6067ec58 53142 web optional nanoblogger_3.2.3-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCvfe0gY5NIXPNpFURAtNfAKDAP14Za1MdadZe+WNlgYsUDCXcSgCfV8oY
F8H+xQOy/WPLkkpX0nbvJ0k=
=P8nk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
