Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:02:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#503419: etch->lenny: libvte-common not upgraded 
because of unmet dep for libvte4
has caused the Debian Bug report #503419,
regarding etch->lenny: libvte-common not upgraded because of unmet dep for 
libvte4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
503419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libvte4
Version: 1:0.12.2-5

System: Xen image - i386 - Kernel 2.6.18-6-xen-686

Hi,

During the upgrade form etch to lenny (aptitude full-upgrade), the following situation occurs:
- libvte-common is not upgraded for not breaking the dependency needed by  
libvte4
- libvte4 remains installed
- libvte9 is installed

After doing a second 'aptitude full-upgrade', the following situation occurs:
- libvte4 is deinstalled
- libvte-common is then upgraded.

I don't know if libvte9 is a full replacement for libvte4. In this case, maybe adding the info 'Replaces: libvte4 (<=1:0.12.2-5)' in the package libvte9 will in the first 'aptitude full-upgrade' run :
- remove libvte4
- install libvte9
- upgrade libvte-common

Giovanni.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
        Hi

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote:
> Is it worth giving a word about this in the release-note ? Something like:
> "During the full-upgrade, aptitude could complain about unmet 
> dependencies for the libvte4 package. Just accept that aptitude keeps 
> libvte-common to its current version for satisfying the libvte4 
> dependencies. At the end of the upgrade, issuing a second "aptitude 
> full-upgrade" should remove the libvte4 package and then upgrade 
> libvte-common to its lenny version."

 I don't think so; I don't see much broken to fix here.  I'm closing
 this bug.  I don't think console messages warrant release notes, but
 thanks for the note.

   Bye
-- 
Loïc Minier


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to