Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:07:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bring back H.261 encoding
has caused the Debian Bug report #476644,
regarding bring back H.261 encoding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
476644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ffmpeg
Severity: wishlist
Version: 0.svn20080206-1
Hi,
according to
<http://blogs.sun.com/openmediacommons/entry/oms_video_a_project_of>
and other resources, SUN develops a new codec called OMS, which "is a
royalty-free codec loosely based on the h.26x codec family". In the
FAQ the question asking "Why have you started from h.261?" is answered
with the following reply:
H.261 was finalized in 1989, outside the (17-year) patent
window. Key tool strategies and prior art were already
established in that era.
Wouldn't this mean that we are also free to ship the built-in H.261
encoder in ffmpeg packages?
Cheers,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3:0.svn20080925-1
--- End Message ---
