Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:47:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314514: fixed in chaksem 1.6c-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 19:35:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 12:35:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dj09T-0003VZ-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:35:47 -0700
Received: from Henry ([82.32.72.32]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with 
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
         Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:36:26 +0100
Received: from joe by Henry with local (Exim 4.51)
        id 1Dj09O-00085u-Ld; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:35:42 +0100
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:35:42 +0100
From: Joe Milbourn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: chaksem: Incorrect colouring of rules in styleframe 'bars'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2005 19:36:26.0349 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[AF7319D0:01C572AA]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: chaksem
Version: 1.6a-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch


The central rule, at both the top and bottom of the slide has no colour
specified, whereas the left and right portions are controlled by either
\botrulecol or \toprulecol as appropriate. 

The patch below corrects this behaviour, and changes the colour of the
footer text to match that of the bars.

Cheers,

Joe Milbourn

[ SNIP ]
--- chaksem.cls.old     2005-06-16 20:10:03.877228964 +0100
+++ chaksem.cls 2005-06-16 20:18:19.036829826 +0100
@@ -114,17 +114,17 @@
 %
 \newpagestyle{withheading}%
   {\thismark}{{\sc\thisheading}\hfill{\sc\thatheading}}
-\def\thisheading{}
-\def\thatheading{\thepage}
+\def\thisheading{\toprulecol }
+\def\thatheading{\toprulecol \thepage}
 \pagestyle{withheading}
 
 % Set footers
 %
 \newcommand{\setfooter}[1]{\setleftfooter{#1}}
 \newcommand{\setleftfooter}[1]{%
-  \gdef\thisheading{#1}}
+  \gdef\thisheading{\toprulecol #1}}
 \newcommand{\setrightfooter}[1]{%
-  \gdef\thatheading{#1}}
+  \gdef\thatheading{\toprulecol#1}}
 
 % \heading[optional text for second line]{Heading text}
 %
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
     \centerline{\textbf{\textsc{\darkgray\large#2}}}%
     \vspace*{.2em}
     \par\ignorespaces%
-    \setfooter{#2}
+    \setfooter{\botrulecol #2}
     }{%
     \begin{center}\textbf{\textsc{\darkgray\large#1\\#2}}\end{center}%
     \setfooter{#1\ldots}
@@ -187,14 +187,14 @@
 %    \centerline{\toprulecol\raise1em\hbox{\rule{\textwidth}{.5pt}}}%
     \centerline{\raise1em\hbox{%
         {\toprulecol\rule{.05\textwidth}{.5pt}}%
-        \rule{.9\textwidth}{.5pt}%
+        \toprulecol\rule{.9\textwidth}{.5pt}%
         {\toprulecol\rule{.05\textwidth}{.5pt}}%
         }}%
     #1%
 %    \centerline{\botrulecol\rule{\textwidth}{.5pt}}%
     \centerline{%
       {\botrulecol\rule{.05\textwidth}{.5pt}}%
-      \rule{.9\textwidth}{.5pt}%
+      \botrulecol\rule{.9\textwidth}{.5pt}%
       {\botrulecol\rule{.05\textwidth}{.5pt}}%
       }%
     }%
[ SNIP ]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-henry.20050217.01
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages chaksem depends on:
ii  tetex-bin                     2.0.2-30   The teTeX binary files

-- no debconf information
-- 
Procrastination means never having to say you're sorry.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314514-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 15:52:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 08:52:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DnINa-00076e-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 08:52:06 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DnIIv-0005jo-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:47:17 -0400
From: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314514: fixed in chaksem 1.6c-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:47:17 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: chaksem
Source-Version: 1.6c-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
chaksem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

chaksem_1.6c-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6c-1.diff.gz
chaksem_1.6c-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6c-1.dsc
chaksem_1.6c-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6c-1_all.deb
chaksem_1.6c.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/chaksem/chaksem_1.6c.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated chaksem package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:47:41 +1000
Source: chaksem
Binary: chaksem
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 chaksem    - LaTeX class for presentations
Closes: 314514
Changes: 
 chaksem (1.6c-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.
     + Includes patch from Joe Milbourn to fix the colour of top and
       bottom rulers.  (Closes: #314514)
   * Remove the article from the beginning of the package synopsis, to
     appease lintian.
   * Updated watch file.
Files: 
 b13ba1f361974380f1ff71718e1f0f40 585 tex optional chaksem_1.6c-1.dsc
 a9c8da38483c49362ed3c0ddfd9fd5a5 6161 tex optional chaksem_1.6c.orig.tar.gz
 216703ac48f4af9fffec0b180ad80440 2647 tex optional chaksem_1.6c-1.diff.gz
 1e6bb8d7e2fc53473e4698b283450eb0 46462 tex optional chaksem_1.6c-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCwW2e5u9oNyz9HDgRAharAKDCfcbosjcqvlpNEQSQsbdcb1/DvwCgzY+l
dt/hhZtUXMyKy0kUQ3U5m2I=
=O6dg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to