Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:03:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: shorewall: Add support for SFS server (secure NFS)
has caused the Debian Bug report #305075,
regarding shorewall: Add support for SFS server (secure NFS)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
305075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=305075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: shorewall
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: wishlist

Add Allow* and Deny* configuration files for SFS - secure FS - server,
which is replacement for NFS.

See http://www.fs.net/sfswww/sfs.html [Topic: fssd_config--Meta-server
configuration => BindAddr] which reads:

    BindAddr ip-addr [port]

    Specifies the IP address and port on which sfssd should listen for
    TCP connections. The default is INADDR_ANY for the address and port 4.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages shorewall depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.48     Debian configuration management sy
ii  iproute                       20041019-3 Professional tools to control the 
ii  iptables                      1.2.11-10  Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis

-- debconf information excluded


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 12:18:31PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Lorenzo,
> 
> Based on Tom Eastep's statement [0], about SNFS being portmap-based like
> NFS, it looks like writing a Shorewall Macro for it is not possible.  I
> would either close this bug or tag it as wontfix.
> 
Seeing as it is not possible to create this macro, I am closing the bug.

Regards,

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to