Your message dated Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:16:02 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#502985: Upgrading Ubuntu release, apt-cacher blocks
{ubuntuname}.tar.gz.gpg files
has caused the Debian Bug report #502985,
regarding Upgrading Ubuntu release, apt-cacher blocks {ubuntuname}.tar.gz.gpg
files
to be marked as done.This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 502985: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502985 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: apt-cacher Version: 1.5.3 Severity: important This bug is relevant to Debian, since apt-cacher can run on a Debian server with Ubuntu clients. It has been reported and fixed in Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager-core/+bug/156070 -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-amd64 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apt-cacher depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.3-6 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libwww-perl 5.805-1 WWW client/server library for Perl ii perl 5.8.8-7etch3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction apt-cacher recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Claudio Satriano wrote: > Package: apt-cacher > Version: 1.5.3 > Severity: important > > > This bug is relevant to Debian, since apt-cacher can run on a Debian > server with Ubuntu clients. > > It has been reported and fixed in Launchpad: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager-core/+bug/156070 This is not fixed in 1.6.7 which has configurable regexps. Thanks, Mark
--- End Message ---
