Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:47:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222384: fixed in mason 1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2003 13:26:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 28 07:26:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.144.162] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1APidQ-0005r9-00; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 07:26:12 -0600
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP 
id hASDQA3Q022640
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
        Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:26:11 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id 
hASDQAOh022638;
        Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:26:10 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:26:10 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mason
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: important

The postinst script seams to contain two concatenated scripts
which both end with a exit 0 statement. So the second part is not 
executed. In the second part is the code to setup the init.d 
links on configure which don't get executed this way

Christoph

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lucy 2.4.20 #1 SMP Fri May 9 15:09:57 MEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages mason depends on:
ii  bash                          2.05a-11   The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  debconf                       1.0.32     Debian configuration management sy


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222384-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 12:55:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 05:55:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DnbpC-0003ZC-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 05:37:54 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DnYKE-0007fy-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 02:53:42 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DnYEf-00023T-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:47:57 -0400
From: Thomas Scheffczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#222384: fixed in mason 1.0.0-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:47:57 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: mason
Source-Version: 1.0.0-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mason, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mason_1.0.0-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mason/mason_1.0.0-3.diff.gz
mason_1.0.0-3.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mason/mason_1.0.0-3.dsc
mason_1.0.0-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mason/mason_1.0.0-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Scheffczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mason package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:41:10 +0200
Source: mason
Binary: mason
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Scheffczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thomas Scheffczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 mason      - Interactively creates a Linux packet filtering firewall.
Closes: 222384 250264 301321 312752
Changes: 
 mason (1.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Incorporated NMU changes (Thanks to Lucas Wall) (closes: #250264,
     #301321)
   * fix postinst to correctly install startup links (closes: #222384)
   * upgrade to policy 3.6.1.0
   * Added Vietnamese debconf template translation (Thanks to Clytie
     Siddall) (closes: #312752)
Files: 
 328b4c36b4f52718ff47df0d4b8db449 602 net extra mason_1.0.0-3.dsc
 f379575eedc36f1f4e1274767444cacb 8349 net extra mason_1.0.0-3.diff.gz
 2207fe8c8ee7d321568a6856ffb77870 461316 net extra mason_1.0.0-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCwk49ICWLj6LjFjIRAtzUAKCskG8L7aLYHZkEtK/doesDQkAabACcDYnz
rPiP8Cg9GaLwDva0pqZs6vM=
=3/VC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to