Your message dated Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:22:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line adjtimex bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #435956,
regarding adjtimex: Please update man page for later kernels
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
435956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: adjtimex
Version: 1.21.1-1
Severity: minor
I am currently debugging a clock problem and hwclock advised me to
read "adjtimex --print". To understand the output, I looked at the man
page:
For --print there is a section for "For Linux 1.0 and 1.2 kernels",
and for "Linux 2.0 kernels". Since Debian ships kernels newer than 2.0
for a long time (I belive at least since Woody) could you update this
section for later kernels, preferably for 2.6?
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.2-grsec-cz01
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages adjtimex depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
adjtimex recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
* adjtimex/run_daemon: false
* adjtimex/compare_rtc: true
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
These were fixed in adjtimex 1.25-1
--- End Message ---
