Your message dated Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:42:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line crm114: more reasonable default mimedecode
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2004 06:27:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 23:27:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from q.bofh.de [212.126.220.202] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BntWn-0006Po-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:27:33 -0700
Received: from uucp by q.bofh.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BntWl-0000Mn-BE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:27:31 +0200
Received: from ataraxia ([192.168.1.2] helo=ataraxia.int.hilluzination.de)
by paranoia with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BntJZ-0007da-Il
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:13:53 +0200
Received: from bengen by ataraxia.int.hilluzination.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BntUz-0005mT-Dt
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:25:41 +0200
From: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crm114: more reasonable default mimedecode
X-Debbugs-CC: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:25:41 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: crm114
Version: 20040627-2
Severity: wishlist
In mailfilter.cf, uncomment
":mime_decoder: /mimencode -u/"
metamail is more common, even though crm114 Recommends: metamail | mew-bin.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-rc1-ataraxia
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages crm114 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libtre4 0.6.8-2 regexp matching library with appro
ii procmail 3.22-9 Versatile e-mail processor
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260995-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 07:42:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 00:42:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (blackbird.zamazal.org) [217.66.176.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoGAV-0005U3-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:42:36 -0700
Received: from pdm by blackbird.zamazal.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DoGA1-0002Cp-2f
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:42:05 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: crm114: more reasonable default mimedecode
From: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 1:20:050701:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::9Ytc2L9omb/1cpOA:00000000000000000000000000000000002Wn8
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050701:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::9Ytc2L9omb/1cpOA:00000000000000000000000000000000002Wn8
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:42:05 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Well, it might be a good idea at the time you sent the report, but now
it could break crm114 operation for people who started to use the
default configuration file (yes, they should always use their own copy,
but I'm not going to educate them by changing the configuration file
contents:-). So I'm closing the bug.
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
And why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
